On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:27, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> This is where I say "Evolution is not a console client"
I don't see how being a GUI app makes any difference. I have used VM by
clicking on it entirely, in an X windows session, as well as in an MS
Windows session.
> and point out
> that this is a hell of a lot more work than it is worth. Not to mention
Now _that_ is a valid point.
> it will severely increase the complexity of the display code, and it's
> already nasty enough as it is without adding to it.
Oh, ok. That's too bad. I hoped that the display code had separate
areas for building the headers and then building the body, and then the
two were put together.
> There has to be a line drawn somewhere where it makes sense to say "no"
> and I believe this feature to be over the line.
Rats. What would it take to change your mind? ;-)
rob
PS. This fortune came up randomly. :-)
--
Linux, the choice | Man's reach must exceed his grasp, for why
of a GNU generation -o) | else the heavens?
Kernel 2.2.20 /\ |
on a i686 _\_v |
|
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
