On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 19:44, Rob Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:27, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > This is where I say "Evolution is not a console client" > > I don't see how being a GUI app makes any difference. I have used VM by > clicking on it entirely, in an X windows session, as well as in an MS > Windows session. > > > > and point out > > that this is a hell of a lot more work than it is worth. Not to mention > > Now _that_ is a valid point. > > > > it will severely increase the complexity of the display code, and it's > > already nasty enough as it is without adding to it. > > Oh, ok. That's too bad. I hoped that the display code had separate > areas for building the headers and then building the body, and then the > two were put together. > > > There has to be a line drawn somewhere where it makes sense to say "no" > > and I believe this feature to be over the line. > > Rats. What would it take to change your mind? ;-) > Mr. Winship said it wasn't a definite no way. Mr. Stedfast seems to say definite no way.
Now, since there seems to be some disagreement within Ximian, we need a call whether to proceed to try and lobby or not. I **REALLY** see the need for the feature, but I'm one voice on a "weird" platform (FreeBSD). What is the "official" Ximian position? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
