On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 20:44, Rob Walker wrote: [snip] > > > it will severely increase the complexity of the display code, and it's > > already nasty enough as it is without adding to it. > > Oh, ok. That's too bad. I hoped that the display code had separate > areas for building the headers and then building the body, and then the > two were put together.
actually the code isn't as nasty as I thought it was... (just took a look) > > > There has to be a line drawn somewhere where it makes sense to say "no" > > and I believe this feature to be over the line. > > Rats. What would it take to change your mind? ;-) someone sending in a patch that was beautifully implemented containing 0 bugs and a sinch to maintain :-) ie, no work will ever have to be done by me ever in the future. I think the better solution would be to do one of the following: 1. expand "Normal Display" by 1 or 2 (max) more (hard coded) headers that would make sense to display. or 2. We add another view "More Headers" that contained say 3 or 4 additional headers that were hard coded. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
