On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 13:22, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > ons, 2002-10-30 kl. 20:58 skrev Dan Winship: > > > He was responding to a direct question. > > Then "his" answer should have been (given the boasted prowess): "How can > I help?"
OK, my turn now. I was asked "you've never done this, have you?". I responded "yes, I have, for this long and doing this". Your extension of this to say I should have said "how can I help" is bulls**t, plain and simple. I got this package to fill a specific need. If the response to a request, and then a question asked directly of me and answered directly by me, is name-calling and "put up or shut up", then this is probably not the software to use, nor is it anything to recommend to anyone who might want to use it. My bottom line is, I don't have time to waste fixing bugs or adding functionality to other people's software. I have my own job where I spend quite enough time. I need an email application that does what I need it to do, and there are some out there. I apparently made a mistake in choosing this, then having the utter temerity to suggest better behavior. And I would have hoped that the response to a question of "why can't it do this" would have been something other than invective and personal attacks. Apparently I was wrong. -- ------ +-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ | Dan O'Reilly | "There are 10 types of people in this | | Principal Engineer | world: those who understand binary | | Process Software | and those who don't." | | http://www.process.com | | +-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
