On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 11:15, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 11:08, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > > > Yes, IMAP in 1.2 may be considerably faster for Courier IMAPd. > > > > > > it's faster for presumably every server *except* uw.imapd. > > > > Yeah, but still, do we have any idea why uw.imapd would be slower? > > uw.imapd re-parses the mbox (it uses mbox as the backend) everytime it > does anything with the folder. That's just plain slow (and inefficient > obviously).
Understood. But then, why would uw.imapd be faster with Evolution 1.0.x? -- Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
