When you make your case to your boss, you should also factor in the cost
of your salary since you have effectively replaced the tape drive.
Figure out what percentage of your weekly hours you spend just backing
things up, and then ask him if he'd be willing to lease a tape drive for
that amount.  Let's say you spend just 10 hours per week on this.  (It
sounds like you may be spending even more...)  Assume you made an annual
salary of just $30,000.00 that would be a never ending lease of
$7,500.00 per year, plus the actual cost of DVD media.  Throw those
numbers at him and see what happens.

Russ Hansen
MCSE +I, MCSE(2k), CCNA, NCP
(614) 374-1300
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Autodesk Discussion List

They go to the backups constantly because the projects change
constantly. I have had a request for the same project 4 times in less
than a week. The client will ask for a major change in the site plan,
and they will make it, and then the next morning the client will ask
them to change it back to the way it was. Or go a whole different
direction based on an even earlier DWG file. They are constantly redoing
and changing things based on plans sent out over the lifetime of a
project. Not just the last plans sent out.
I was thinking about proposing a server that had read only access to
closed projects. It is a useful idea. But that brings us back to the
backups nightmare again. 
I guess for some reason they think it is cheaper to have me sit here
bored out of my skull than to have it automated.
All these suggestions and comments are helping me to form my argument
and proposal. 
Thanks again
Rachel
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Autodesk Discussion List

Why are these folks asking for files from backup for?  Is it because
they
hosed the file, accidentally deleted it?  Depending on what reasons they
need access to backups, there may be a more cost effective solution.  We
access tape backups once or twice a week.

We archive projects but keep them on a server and permit only read
access to
them.  We store them on Quantum Snap servers because the price per GB is
so
cheap. (480GB of RAID5 storage for $3500).

-----Original Message-----
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Autodesk Discussion List


Thanks Jim,
That is what I had thought. 
Until 1998 they had some sort of off brand tape drive, and no spare tape
drive. When the tape drive died the data recovery company told him it
would
cost 20K per tape to recover. He decided not to pay and went to CD at
the
time. 
This is just eating more and more of my time and I have less and less
time
as the company grows. It was 40 people when I started and now we are up
to
64, with more expected. 
Do your users need to access backups multiple times daily? Every where
else
I have worked getting into backups happened less than once a month.

The other problem is that he won't archive. Projects stay on the server
period. I have stuff on the server from 1996. 
rachel
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Autodesk Discussion List



 Did you tell him every has had a bad experience with tapes _at least_
once?


  I work for an architectural firm and the file sizes and quantities of
files (it takes yeasr sometimes to build buildings, so projects stay
live on
the server for years!), are larger than anybody else I've heard of.

  Of course, all of those guys who make tapes and drives _say_ that
there
products are absolutely reliable, but nobody (in my price range, anyway)
has
been able to back that up.

 I just use DLT tapes (no loaders) with the simplest software I can get
my
hands on. That's wehre I've found my best reliability.

Jim Helfer
WTW Architects
 Pittsburgh PA
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rachel
Pickens
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Autodesk Discussion List

Can anyone recommend their favorite Autodesk newsgroup?
Does anyone out there support Autodesk or a Civil Engineering or
Architecture environment? I have to give the President in the company a
reality check on the demands of the backup travesty he insists on, and
would
like to discuss best practices with someone. He had a bad experience
with
tapes once (1998) and refuses to even consider going back to it. I am
having
to backup 80G to DVD every month.

(Don't panic, this is for file server only, I snuck in a tape drive for
Exchange when I built it. He found out last month.) Thank you for your
time.
Rachel


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Reply via email to