I don't and didn't profess to be a genius! Anyway, our logs are pretty small, should I be periodically copying them to another server throughout the day ? I have a old server which I could use for this.
Matt -- > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] > Sent: Tuesday, 16 March 2004 5:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 performance > > > Just because you haven't had a catastrophe doesn't make you a > genius. You lose that disk array and you probably lose all > mail after the last backup. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Anthony Sollars > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 7:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 performance > > For small installations it is not an issue at all. We have > Exchange 5.5 servers with 500 users on them and they have 5 > disk in RAID 5, logically partitioned for OS, Logs, Db. Not > saying this is optimal but they run solid and have been for 6 > years, now we have one Exchange 5.5 servers in South America > with the same config and it is having disk i/o performance > issues. So there is a limit to going the cheaper route. But > as we all migrate to Exchange 2003 and load out servers with > several thousand users, this optimization becomes a much > needed step. Not only for performance but for stability since > one server handles so many users. > > Tony > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Matthew Joyce > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 3:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 performance > > > I have my store and logs on the same array and have not > experienced any issues. What are the concerns with doing this ? > > I have a 5 drive Raid5, I did not want to use Raid1 + Raid5 > because the amount of cpacity use for tollerance would > increase from 20% to 40%. > > > > Matt > > > -- > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gonzalez, Alex > > Sent: Tuesday, 16 March 2004 2:04 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 performance > > > > > > Definitly the RAID1 would be better. I dont know when you > would ever > > want to put the DB and logs on the same array if you have > another one. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Fyodorov, Andrey FTL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 9:57 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 performance > > > > > > What does your gut tell you? > > > > Mine tells me that the logs will like it better on the RAID1. > > Not the ideal configuration but better than having them on the same > > volume as the DBs. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Mikael Andersson > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 3:51 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Exchange 2003 performance > > > > > > Im setting up a new Exchange 2003 server and my question is how I > > should configure it to get the best performance. The machine have 5 > > disks, two disks in a RAID-1 configuration that holds the OS, and > > three disks in a RAID-5 configuration that will hold the database, > > where should I put the logs to get the best performance, on > the RAID-1 > > with the OS or the > > RAID-5 with the database? > > > > /micke > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: > Jupitermedia Corp. > Attn: Discussion List Management > 475 Park Avenue South > New York, NY 10016 > > Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: > Jupitermedia Corp. > Attn: Discussion List Management > 475 Park Avenue South > New York, NY 10016 > > Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > ext_mode=& > lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: > Jupitermedia Corp. > Attn: Discussion List Management > 475 Park Avenue South > New York, NY 10016 > > Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
