I kind of agree but its like any other rule book, instead of throwing out the rule book and starting a new rule book I think it makes sense to develop the existing one so it works. So my 2 cents worth is to sort this mess out with new RFCs. At least RFC compliance gives us a common framework to work within.
Mick -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPF Warning > Why are we so hung up on RFC compliance. When it comes to SMTP it's time > to make HUGE revisions. I'm sick and tired of us sticking with a broken > mail protocol in the name of RFC compliance. Let me try a different tack... What problems does SPF solve in the currently broken SMTP protocol? _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
