> Banyan's Directory is what Microsoft has been trying to > implement for the past 10 years. The Banyan technology is > still superior as evidenced by the struggle of our efforts to > do ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@* message) what I was able to do in 1990. I mean here > we are over 15 years later and still can't do it.
The [EMAIL PROTECTED]@* format is a proprietary implementation unless there is an SMTP RFC lurking out there that I have somehow missed. Banyan may be superior, but the argument you've presented here fails to demonstrate that in the least. It's nominally as entertaining as those who complain that Exchange doesn't implement plus addressing. A solution to provide similar functionality has been offered. Use it or don't. If you want to tell us all the TRUTH, drink your coffee and make a coherent argument. At the moment you sound like a crank and have thus far only managed to reduce my opinion of Banyan Vines. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
