The real issue is the size of your network between the sites. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To double take or not My management insists users get as big a mail box as they want. Some exceed 4 GB! Can EMS be used in a way that's affordable in my envirnment? TIA Orin Rehorst -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To double take or not I was of course making up that statistic on the fly based on my personally opinion. If you want to say more then that I would support a higher number like 99%. --Kevinm WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org Wonder what To get me cuz you love me? This link will help http://www.hedonists.ca/index.php/gift-wish-list -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To double take or not I'd say more than 90%, but I'm a little biased. <gd&r> -- Chris Scharff Messaging Services Architect MessageOne 512.652.4500 EMS Email Continuity: Exchange may be down, but e-mail is still up. http://www.messageone.com/email-continuity/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm Posted At: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:56 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: To double take or not Subject: RE: To double take or not I would say that EMS should be sufficient for about 90% of the situations where an asynchronous replication solution, like doubletake, is considered. --Kevinm WLKMMAS http://www.wlkmmas.org Wonder what To get me cuz you love me? This link will help http://www.hedonists.ca/index.php/gift-wish-list -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Woods Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To double take or not We use Double Take and it's worked great. It's passed our DR audits in demonstrations and we've failed over once. This was in the 5.5 world. I'm just finishing up configuring our 2003 world and it seems like it'll work just as well, though I haven't tested it yet. We're also going to a third party off site solution from MessageOne called EMS so that we have all of our bases covered. I've also tested it with SQL and our DBA was impressed. We also use log shipping for SQL just incase. Cheers, Tony -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aristotle Zoulas Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: To double take or not We need to replicate (and make Highly Available) two exchange 2003 servers to two other DR servers. We are considering Legato Autostart or Doubletake. Doubletake is coming it at much less money. Wondering what we would not get with double take. We ultimately want to use those same DR servers for SQL DR purposes. Legato seems to be more of an Enterprise product. TIA _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. This message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender and destroy this message. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
