They made people aware of this because it's security related; and it was one of the large hosting companies that initially ran into the problem.
That being said, for your "average" customer, it's unlikely that they will be doing much moving around of PF mailboxes. At least, that is my evaluation. Your evaluation may differ. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 4:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: Schema updates for Exchange 2010 SP2 and 2013 CU2 http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/07/12/e2013-rtm-cu2-issue-public-folder-permissions-loss-after-pf-mailbox-move.aspx On 7/12/2013 11:26 AM, Adam Farage wrote: > Hello Robert, > > Your Exchange 2010 servers need to be updated to SP3. That would > include the schema updates for Exchange 2010 SP3. > This allows Exchange 2013 to interface and communicate with Exchange > 2010. This also will allow the installation of Exchange 2013 into a > domain with an already existing Exchange 2010 Organization. > > Adam Farage, Principle Officer / UC Consultant Farage Consulting > Solutions LLC > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > *From:* [email protected] > <[email protected]> on behalf of Sobey, Richard A > <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, July 12, 2013 11:36 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Exchange] RE: Schema updates for Exchange 2010 SP2 and > 2013 CU2 > > Hi Adam, > > Thanks. Yes, I understand I need 2010 SP3. My question relates to the > schema upgrade required: can I upgrade to Exchange 2013 CU2 level > schema and THEN install 2010 SP3, or do I need to upgrade to 2010 SP3 > schema AND 2013 CU2 schema as 2 steps? > > Or, are you saying that I won't be able to extend the schema to 2013 > CU2 unless all Exchange 2010 servers are at SP3? > > I'm just trying to avoid two schema updates is all. > > Richard > > *From:*[email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Farage > *Sent:* 12 July 2013 15:29 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Exchange] RE: Schema updates for Exchange 2010 SP2 and > 2013 CU2 > > Hello Richard, > > You will have to upgrade the Exchange 2010 servers to Service Pack 3 > prior to installing Exchange 2013 CU2 in the same domain. This > includes extending the schema. > > When Exchange 2013 CU2 runs the pre-req checks, it will see Exchange > 2010 SP2 and lower machines and then error / exit. > > Thanks, > > > Adam Farage, Principle Officer / UC Consultant Farage Consulting > Solutions LLC > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > *From:*[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Sobey, Richard A > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > *Sent:* Friday, July 12, 2013 8:54 AM > *To:* [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > *Subject:* [Exchange] Schema updates for Exchange 2010 SP2 and 2013 > CU2 > > Hi all, > > We're looking at deploying Exchange 2013 CU2. First we need to go to > 2010 SP3. Can we avoid doing two schema updates by applying ONLY the > 2013 CU2 changes, or MUST we use 2010 SP3 first, and then 2013 CU2? > > Disclaimer: I haven't Googled for this information at all. Lazy. > > Thanks > > Richard > -- Looking for PCI guidance for a SMB server? Thinking about what's next for your SMB client in the post SBS era? Looking for a recipe for Fava Beans? We got you covered at the SMBKitchen project: http://www.thirdtier.net/2013/04/how-to-join-the-smbkitchen-project/
