If E-mail reliability (aka - "uptime") is paramount, the case is almost made for you.
Do a simple cost/benefit analysis of taking the database off-line to defrag it.
Cost = Downtime of Exchange server
Benefit = 2Gb of additional free space (unless the server is low on space, benefit is
almost 0)
Eric
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:44:15 -0500, "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> To All That Replied:
>
> Thx 4 all the angles @ which I can approach my manager. I WILL use them
> in our next conversation. However, e-mail is a very sensitive subject for
> my CIO ever since an Internal Services survey was done and reported that
> of all IT services, e-mail is used by 99.9% of the client base. And since
> his boss preaches "Customer Service" 1st and above all other things,
> e-mail reliability is Paramount. So, my manager generally likes to see
> info from the manufacturer justifing what we "engineers" recommend should
> or should not be done, thus the quest for a TechNet/KB article.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
