I liked the fluff, but loved this.
When I used to do telephone tech support, we used to bury the people
that THOUGHT they were tech savvy in a load of Tech BS. Saying
essentially the same things to them.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Benjamin Scott
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
No no no, you want this:
"Due to possible issues concerning the dynamic nature of slack space,
combined with the low per-unit cost of direct-access magnetic storage, I
believe our most optimum solution path lies with following a
continuously available operational strategy, and negative approval of
any manual de-fragmentation process."
If they're smart enough to figure that out, they won't ask any more
questions. If they aren't, they still won't. ;-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
| not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person,
| entity or | organization. All information is provided without
| warranty of any kind. |
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
