Best answer!!!!! Outsource your email and don't sweat about it just right a check every month.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:12 AM Subject: RE: Better Version > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:06 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Better Version > > > > > > Unfortunately members like your seem to have enough time to > > sit there and type an email while you have nothing better to do... > > We're being chastised for choosing to monitor this list and help people when > we can rather than working to solve world hunger? Well, I've already come up > with an answer to the latter problem so go away. > > > I am sure that most of us on this list are busy running > > around, and don't have time to type CRAP out.... > > Then fscking call PSS. If you can't be bothered to ask a properly phrased > technical question then you have no right to complain about the quality of > the answer you receive. In fact I think people were quite restrained in > their responses to your pathetic inquiry. > > > So.. Thanks to those of you who replied to me in a serious > > fashion (online or offline) Like Tim Ault (Thanks Tim) > > Tim was just rhetorically exercising his mental curiosity. It was an amazing > coincidence it happened to coincide with your lame post. > > > So.. Sander Van But-sit-still-nothing-better-2-do-zer "Get a > > job were you earn your living...!! - and don't clog peoples > > mail with Crap" > > Now I don't have a complete archive imported yet, but in reviewing Sander's > posting history that I do have and comparing it to yours I have to conclude > that you inadvertently substituted "Sander Van-$foo-zer" for "Adrian > Van-I'm-a-lazy-shaved-monkey-who-is-incapable-of-forming-an-intelligent-ques > tion-den". > > Next thing we know you'll be asking what the best freaking fax software is. > > Stinkin troll. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2001 5:48 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Better Version > > > > > > His question is on the same lines as: "GM vs.Toyota?". The > > question means nothing, the only true answer he should be > > getting is "It depends on his local situation." I agree there > > is merit in analyzing which of the two Exchange systems suits > > one better, but only if you take all the factors into > > account. Adriaan, apart from sending it 4 times, gives no > > information. I know it is a dead horse, but isn't one > > supposed to do a least a bit of homework before asking a > > question? The result of that would be a qualified question, > > not a broad topic which can be interpreted anyway you want. I > > see some answers have gone the "benefits of win2k" route, > > some look at costs etc which could or could not be relevant. > > > > Has Adriaan put any thought into this? I don't think so, > > hence my response (plus his previous questions to this forum > > also don't convince me he makes any effort of solving his own > > questions) Good thing my old Unix pal didn't see his post, he > > would just mail the guy - RTFM. (not that that necessarily > > solves anything) > > > > So, put in its proper context it is a good question, coming > > from Adriaan like this, it is not. > > > > Sander > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:15 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Better Version > > > > > > Why is this a dumb question? This is a very good question, in > > fact. Corporations have been struggling with this questions > > for over a year. > > > > No less than Tony Redmond breeched the subject at MECC '2000 > > and again at the MEC earlier this month. > > > > There are good reasons to move to Ex2k. The decision is a > > little easier for those shops that have no exchsrvr, or where > > NT does is not the primary f&p sharing service. Then there > > are the "one issue" folks: OWA2k is important to us, multiple > > storage groups is important to us, etc. > > > > Let's make no bones about it: building Ex2k is a significant > > undertaking. And one that takes careful planning and good > > understanding of AD > > (whazzat?) > > and x.500 (comeagain?) and 2k's accessory constituent > > requirements (RG, CA, SG, ADC, MMC..hey wherez Admin?). The > > daunting reality of incorporating an moving to a new OS along > > with a new email server software gives some pause and > > reconsider the value-add that is compelling it. And > > rightfully so, I think. > > > > Tim. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:27 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Better Version > > > > > > Are you really this daft or just playing the fool? > > Unfortunately, there appears to be nothing wrong with your > > send button, can you try disabling it? > > > > Sander > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:42 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Better Version > > > > > > Exchange 2K or 5.5? > > > > Thanks > > > > Adriaan Van Huissteden > > > > Network Administrator > > Connect Credit Union > > Phone: (03) 6233 0660 > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
