Yeah, the LTO is excellent. We're still trying to convince them to buy it for us though. It isn't the shark, although there are two of those in the building. This one is the 3584-L32 tape library. The SAN made a huge difference in our backups times with the DLT because it eliminated any servers we had that were backing up via the network, with the LTO though, the speed difference was insane.
http://www.storage.ibm.com/hardsoft/tape/3584/index.html It most definitely isn't cheap though. Phil > So you liking that LTO SAN combo? you using the IBM shark by > chance? We > piloted that hardware, it was really nice but about 100k$ more then we > wanted to spend. We ended up going with > commvault/spectralogic combo. We > will probably add SAN next budget year. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
