Hear Hear . . . and can I say Chris has been a monumental help, many times . . . . even if he did make me read a few Q articles. Oh . . . and all his posts have lead me in the right direction.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hunter, Lori" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:04 PM Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > Mr. Scharff's answer is not only legitimate, it is correct. You asked for > the source, Technet is the source of much of his wisdom. > > Now just what good would it do you to have this answer spoon-fed to you? > Well, next time you had a question you'd think "hey, those Exchange chaps do > all the research for you - let me go ask them!" And if all the TechNet > Searching Experts around here had a holiday, you'd be SOL now wouldn't you. > > Better to be off searching in vain and learn something in the process than > to never search at all. > > <smackback> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > Let's not be that way shall we? I asked a legitimate question, and if you > didn't feel the need to answer then there was no need to say anything at > all. The concept of "if you can't say something nice..." is something most > people pick up in kindergarden or earlier, might be time for a refresher > course in how to act like a decent human being :) > > I stand by my original words, plenty of experience with multiple Exch boxes > has provided nary a glitch caused by an Outlook install. Is it possible > that Outlook causes problems in some situations? I'm sure it is, but making > the universal claim to NEVER install Outlook on an Exch box was simply > begging for a reference. Basically, I called you on your sh*t and you > weinered out. > > So, are you feeling motivated to look it up "for me" now or does this taste > of smackdown suit you? > > -s- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:56 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > It would have required that I go look it up for you. I knew > > where the data > > was, but didn't bother to memorize the Q number. I shall > > endeavor to try > > harder for you next time. > > > > Chris > > -- > > Chris Scharff > > Senior Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:51 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > Interestingly enough, the same number of keystrokes could > > > have been used to display a knowledgebase article "Qxxxxxx" > > > to which you're alluding. But that would be too > > > straightforward, eh? :) > > > > > > -s- > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:23 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > TechNet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:34 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... I've had Outlook98/2K installed on several Exchange > > > > > 5.5 boxes (needed for certain backup agents, the InterOrg > > > > > Synchronization Tool, etc) without any detrimental effects. > > > > Sources? > > > > > > > > > > -s- > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:23 PM > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What ever you do. Do NOT install Outlook on the > > > Exchange server. > > > > > > There has been known problems with that > > configuration. Because > > > > > > Exchange Server uses a different MAPI dll than Outlook. > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
