OK, Steven... obviously you are new here. A search of the archives will show you that Mr. Scharff has provided a prodigious amount of useful information to this list over the years that I've been here (and he was here long before I was). Yes, I know him personally and happen to like him, but that's not why I'm defending him (not that he needs me to defend him-- he usually does fine on his own). You are working under the fallacious assumption that TechNet and Qxxxxxxx are the same number of keystrokes. Well, you are wrong. There may be people who can cite Q-article numbers that they have had recent or frequent experience with from memory, but I don't know of anyone that has them all memorized. So, to provide you with an article number, Mr. Scharff would have had to perform many keystrokes and mouse-clicks while searching for the article that proves his point. Since he's not paid to do your work, he chose to let you do the search yourself, as it is a fairly simple one to accomplish.
If I were so inclined, I could do it now... unfortunately for you, I'm not paid to do your research either, nor am I all that interested in the answer. TechNet articles describing the scenario you site do exist; I've stumbled across them before and know that they exist. If I really wan the information, I'm not too lazy to look it up myself. Please read the FAQ (link at the bottom of this message), especially the part entitled "What to do before you post." Also realize that all the members here donate their time, and are under no obligation to provide information to anyone. Especially to those who have a pi$$-poor attitude. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept You can say alotta bad things about the Arsehole Union, but you can't deny the coming to the defense of their members :) Time to face the unavoidable facts, this Chris fellow was wrong and is puffing up his chest in a vain attempt to divert attention from his blunder. When one makes an extraordinary claim, one best be prepared to offer extraordinary proof to back your case up. Heck , this chap can't even summon up the strength to type out 6 digits. -s- > -----Original Message----- > From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:55 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > It doesn't taste of smackdown. Yet. > > -- Drew > ******************************** > Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! > We cannot do evil to others without doing it to ourselves. -- > Joseph Francois > Eduard Desmahis > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven Cox > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > Let's not be that way shall we? I asked a legitimate > question, and if you > didn't feel the need to answer then there was no need to say > anything at > all. The concept of "if you can't say something nice..." is > something most > people pick up in kindergarden or earlier, might be time for > a refresher > course in how to act like a decent human being :) > > I stand by my original words, plenty of experience with > multiple Exch boxes > has provided nary a glitch caused by an Outlook install. Is > it possible > that Outlook causes problems in some situations? I'm sure it > is, but making > the universal claim to NEVER install Outlook on an Exch box was simply > begging for a reference. Basically, I called you on your sh*t and you > weinered out. > > So, are you feeling motivated to look it up "for me" now or > does this taste > of smackdown suit you? > > -s- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:56 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > It would have required that I go look it up for you. I knew > > where the data > > was, but didn't bother to memorize the Q number. I shall > > endeavor to try > > harder for you next time. > > > > Chris > > -- > > Chris Scharff > > Senior Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > If you can't measure, you can't manage! > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:51 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > Interestingly enough, the same number of keystrokes could > > > have been used to display a knowledgebase article "Qxxxxxx" > > > to which you're alluding. But that would be too > > > straightforward, eh? :) > > > > > > -s- > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:23 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > TechNet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:34 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... I've had Outlook98/2K installed on several Exchange > > > > > 5.5 boxes (needed for certain backup agents, the InterOrg > > > > > Synchronization Tool, etc) without any detrimental effects. > > > > Sources? > > > > > > > > > > -s- > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:23 PM > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: RE: Conference Room Auto Accept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What ever you do. Do NOT install Outlook on the > > > Exchange server. > > > > > > There has been known problems with that > > configuration. Because > > > > > > Exchange Server uses a different MAPI dll than Outlook. > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
