Not if Kinkos is about 150 miles away. There is not a Kinkos or any
other shop such as Kinkos for about 3 counties.

********************
Mike Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.domitianx.com

Master Of The Spoon People
Keeper Of None
******************** 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:11 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Fax
> 
> 
> For 7 faxes a year you can walk to a Kinko's.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Fax
> 
> 
> For a whoppin 7 faxes a year, I wouldn't do anything beyond 
> WinFax.  I might even be inclined to use the Symantec Fax 
> program that comes with W2K...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:22 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Fax
> 
> 
> I am not looking for anything fancy. I just want the ability 
> to fax out of Outlook and receive faxes. I get about 2 per 
> year and I send about 5 per year.
>  
> I was hoping to not spend any money if I dont have to. I may 
> have to look to something like WinFax.
> 
>       -----Original Message----- 
>       From: Dupler, Craig 
>       Sent: Thu 11/15/2001 12:54 PM 
>       To: Exchange Discussions 
>       Cc: 
>       Subject: RE: Fax
>       
>       
> 
>       Oh, one other thing.  If someone on the outside of your 
> company is
>       sophisticated enough to be able to handle supplemental 
> DTMF addressing to
>       cause an inbound fax arriving at your Exchange Server 
> to be properly routed,
>       then that person will have access to a digital route, 
> which basically means
>       that inbound automatic routing can work, but no one is 
> ever going to use it.
>       You can buy the technology, but that does not make it 
> worthwhile. Inbound
>       will have to be manually forwarded.
>       
>       Fax really is an obsolete technology that is probably 
> less useful than an
>       Underwood.
>       
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:37 AM
>       To: Exchange Discussions
>       Subject: RE: Fax
>       
>       
>       I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses)
>       
>       Can Exchange act as a fax server?  Not exactly.  Fax's 
> can be transported by
>       SMTP as a registered MIME type.  This of course makes 
> the server blind to
>       the content, and means that it can be a client issue.  
> However, Exchange
>       Server can also have a FAX service or connector 
> installed.  This enables the
>       server itself to drive a modem or high grade telephony 
> board to either
>       directly send or receive faxes.  Outbound, MAPI clients (i.e.
> Outlook) or
>       OWA clients can send to a fax recipient using ad hoc 
> addressing, once the
>       FAX address type has been created by adding such a 
> service.  Of course,
>       permanent fax addressees can be stored in the AD/GAL or 
> the PAB/CL.
>       Inbound, is a little trickier.  If the inbound fax has some DTMF
>       supplemental addressing that maps (insert magic box 
> here) to an AD/GAL
>       addressee, then the MTA can deliver it.  Alternately, 
> they can be routed to
>       a specific printer, or a specific secretarial addressee 
> for manual
>       forwarding.
>       
>       Several vendors make one of these combination fax 
> connector and magic box
>       servers for Exchange.
>       
>       Microsoft Fax is a client tool.  It is not Exchange 
> Server aware. It's been
>       awhile since I looked at it, but if it can save a 
> document as a fax file,
>       then presumably this could be attached to a mail 
> message and the proper MIME
>       type would get applied. But as the EG's said, this 
> would be lame beyond
>       belief or any human comprehension.  Usually people are 
> interested in
>       transmitting digital data and getting non-digital data 
> into some sort of
>       intelligible format.  To take a perfectly good digital 
> document, then store
>       it as a useless piece of raster junk, and then send it 
> as an SMTP attachment
>       to someone that has some sort of a junky raster-only 
> printer, well, that
>       would be sad.  So it is hard to imagine a scenario in 
> which someone would
>       want to spend money integrating MS Fax to an e-mail service. 
>       
>       The right way to leverage MS Fax is in a scenario in 
> which you have a
>       requirement for a small number of users to send or 
> receive Faxes, but can't
>       cost justify the incremental cost of something like 
> OmTool for Exchange over
>       the cost of some personal modems.
>       
>       Some organizations are going to be in a bind with this. 
>  Most good
>       enterprise security policies prohibit using a personal 
> modem to link to an
>       external connection while at the same time being 
> connected to the enterprise
>       network.  Obviously, something like OmTool solves this 
> problem, but that
>       does not make the cost story any prettier.
>       
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:58 PM
>       To: Exchange Discussions
>       Subject: Fax
>       
>       
>       Can Exchange act as a Fax Server? Does it integrate 
> with MS Fax? I want
>       to be able to Fax out of Outlook, but I want to avoid  
> buying something
>       like winfax.
>       
>       ********************
>       Mike Carlson
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       http://www.domitianx.com
>       
>       Master Of The Spoon People
>       Keeper Of None
>       ********************
>       
>       
> _________________________________________________________________
>       List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>       Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>       To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>       
> _________________________________________________________________
>       List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>       Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>       To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>       
> _________________________________________________________________
>       List posting FAQ:
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>       Archives:
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
>       To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
> 
> .+--xm> ,)sr(캷\檆bᢽ!> 0> m&z rᳬ:.˛
> m隊[hyc\z[,
> )rቄZ Zvhᵧ+-i٢2৞G(
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
.+-��-�xm����,�)�r����(����\����ـ��b��!���0�
���&�ȭzǚ����r��:.�˛���m隊[h��y�\���z[,�)�r����Z����Zvh��+-i٢��2�G(


Reply via email to