Most of my users only use the bathroom a couple of times a day too, but I consider bathrooms to be an important feature to have. Our users make quite a bit of use of Outlook functionality, actually. E-mail may be the most common use, but we also schedule all of our conference rooms and common assets via Outlook, we do meeting invitations, use public folders, tasks folders and a few even make use of the Journal.
With the Exchange back-end it's a powerful information tool -- one that I'm not inclined to take away from my users just so I can try and teach them Pegasus. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Ban Outlook > > > I'm wondering why everyone is so resistant to the notion of > using a different email client. I administer a network with > only 500 workstations and I still have my hands full > maintaining patches for Win2k, Outlook2k, etc.... Considering > the fact that very little of Outlook's functionality is used > on a day-to day basis by the average user, what is the > downside? .+--x m > ,)牥r(亷 \檆bች!䠶 > 0 > &zǚ顱r马:.˛ > m隊[hy潬\z[,愠)r䉄Z Zvh孧+-i٢2荞G( > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
