RE: Ban Outlook

[Thomas Di Nardo]

I don't blame you. <G>

Go ... the fish tacos are calling!

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ban Outlook

Several reponses came to mind, but as it's almost lunchtime here I
thought
better of it. ;)

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ban Outlook
> 
> 
> Geez Ben, we're talking about penny pinching and 
> functionality. Why would you want a bathroom? A bucket next 
> to the desk will work just fine. The added benefit is that 
> your workers never need to leave the desk. Look at the 
> potential productivity increase!
> 
> Tom.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:01 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ban Outlook
> 
> Most of my users only use the bathroom a couple of times a 
> day too, but I consider bathrooms to be an important feature 
> to have.  Our users make quite a bit of use of Outlook 
> functionality, actually.  E-mail may be the most common use, 
> but we also schedule all of our conference rooms and common 
> assets via Outlook, we do meeting invitations, use public 
> folders, tasks folders and a few even make use of the Journal.
> 
> With the Exchange back-end it's a powerful information tool 
> -- one that I'm not inclined to take away from my users just 
> so I can try and teach them Pegasus.
> 
> Aloha,
> 
> -Ben-
> Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
> Director of Information Services
> Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:55 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Ban Outlook
> > 
> > 
> > I'm wondering why everyone is so resistant to the notion of
> > using a different email client. I administer a network with 
> > only 500 workstations and I still have my hands full 
> > maintaining patches for Win2k, Outlook2k, etc.... Considering 
> > the fact that very little of Outlook's functionality is used 
> > on a day-to day basis by the average user, what is the 
> > downside? .+--x
 m
> > ,)牥r(亷
\檆bች!䠶
> > 0
> > ৑&zǚ顱r马:.˛
> > m隊[hy潬\z[,愠)r䉄Z Zvh孧+-i٢2荞G(
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> .+--x
m
> ,)r(ື
\檆b=!6
> 0
> ৑&zǚ1r,:.˛
> m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZ Zvh'+-i٢2G(
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+-��-�x
m����,�)�r����(����\����ـ��b��!���0�
���&�ȭzǚ����r��:.�˛���m隊[h��y�\���z[,�)�r����Z����Zvh��+-i٢��2�G(