Oh, there you go.  SP4 would have changed things back the "WAY" they
"SHOULD" be.

D

"Who's General Failure and why's he reading my disk?" -Anon

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access


There's you answer.  I "think" the upgrade to 5.5 SP4 would have "reset" the
static RPC ports defined previously.  You can set this back...but, I would
not recommend doing so.  

Your best bet is to implement a VPN solution if users wish to access the
Exchange Server via the Internet using a "Mapi" based client.

I believe the FAQ has some information on doing this.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Client Access


Sorry for not being clear,
upgraded  to 5.5 sp4
patched IIS
updated ie to 5.5 sp2 and security patches

This is kind of a weird situation, security was not a concern of this
company until around the last six months. I do want to close the machine off
from the internet as much as possible, but I want to know why this isn't
working.

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to