Just confirmed last night and Microsoft classifies Geoclusters as a "Vendor-supported solution"
-----Original Message----- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, May 18, 2002 12:24 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange Redundancy Subject: Re: Exchange Redundancy I don't think so. MS does support Geoclusters ... as long as you didn't do special tweaking and the hardware is in the HCL list. -------------------------- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Mynhier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 2:51 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy I guess that's all good and fine unless you ever need PSS for anything. I'm betting that falls firmly in the realm of "unsupported configuration" -----Original Message----- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:52 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange Redundancy Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy We are using an Exchange 2000 active/passive cluster with NSI's Geocluster product. Geocluster extends MS Cluster Services by allowing each server in the cluster to have their own disk storage (no shared disk as in traditional clustering). Geocluster has worked well with Exchange 2000 and we've had few problems. Tom Bloom Texas A&M University -----Original Message----- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Did Double-take mirror the entire Information Store in real time? I know Octopus would choke if someone tried to mirror a very large file. -----Original Message----- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy I have used Doubletake and Co-standby in the Exchange 5.5 and co-standby is the Winner in my book. If I ever get the ex2k up and mailboxes moved over (almost done) I will use co-standby for that as well. -----Original Message----- From: David Weinstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Clustering will do that but you will not get load balancing - Microsoft's implementation of clustering is hot standby -----Original Message----- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy It's still called clustering. Serdar Soysal -----Original Message----- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Redundancy Having just had our sole Exchange server go down, is there a way of having a redundant server (or load balancing) that is an exact replicar (in terms of user mailboxes etc..)? Basically i am after failover redundacy, so that if one server goes down it will not effect users abilities to send and recive mail. - Is this practical? _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
