I'd bet the same people who say not to do exactly what you are doing are VERY comfortable with esetuil and isinteg.
That's precisely why they say *not* to do it. ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange > > > Fair enough -- here's what we do: > Once a quarter, perform offline integrity check via eseutil. > Twice a year, perform offline defrag via eseutil. > Really nothing more than what some people recommend. Sure, > some people > don't feel comfortable with offline maintenance, but our > usage trends pretty > much require it every so often to get rid of all the dead > space. And yes, > we keep backup copies of the databases just in case we break > something. :) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:58 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange > > > > > > Explain what you mean by the phrase "rigorous maintenance". > > Your administrative practices may be the root cause of the > > problem you are trying to solve. > > > > Serdar Soysal > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:20 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Outlook appointments on Exchange > > > > > > We're having a severe problem with a few mailboxes on our > > Exchange 5.5 server, even though we maintain a rigorous > > maintenance schedule on our stores. A few users (all running > > Outlook 2000 SR-1) can no longer respond to any appointment > > invitations -- doing so causes outlook.exe to fail with a Dr. > > Watson access violation error. Running /cleanfreebusy does > > not cause Outlook to hang (as happens when some calendar > > corruption occurs), but it doesn't solve the problem, either. > > This problem follows the user to other workstations as well > > -- it's definitely tied to the mailbox, not the client. > > Exmerge can successfully pull down the contents of the > > mailbox, but I'd rather not use that to recreate the mailbox > > because it will break all the existing appointment links. > > TechNet and newsgroup scans have provided zero solutions ... > > any ideas, anyone? > > > > Thanks, > > Jon > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
