Exchange offline defrags are rarely if ever necessary. Is there a compelling reason to have diskkeeper within 100 miles of the server?
> -----Original Message----- > From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience > > > As noted before I found my store.exe at 500,000 K this > morning ( An exchange server for 25 people) and the CPU at > 100%. Restarting IS fixed the memory > usage but not the CPU usage. So I killed DiskKeeper 7 which > I had running > in "smart schedule" mode. But it took me a few hours to > figure that it was the process using all the CPU. (It took > me a bit of time to take a clear look and not run around like > a chicken with it's head cut off. And yes I learned a thing > or two). So then read a bit and e-mailed exec. Software. They > indicate that I should not have to exclude any files from the > DK defrag process and that they had no further info on what > could have happened. And they also indicate that I should run > an offline defrag of exchange using DK once a month or so. > Of course I asked for data to support this suggestion as it > seems many folks here never use the exchange offline defrag. > > Jim Liddil > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
