And 4 years ago Microsoft told you running Exchange aware AV on your boxes was a big no no. Ideal configurations and reality often have little correlation. (Says he who just installed AD and E2K on a laptop)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:01 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience > > > And that is a BIG NO NO! Exchange Server should not be used > for a file server. Microsoft will tell you nothing but > Exchange should be on the Server. Except maybe AV software > for Exchange. > > Geoff....... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience > > > Well if this server was only for exchange I'd say no. But > the reality is that this server is also used as file server. > > Jim Liddil > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:46 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience > > > > > > Exchange offline defrags are rarely if ever necessary. Is there a > > compelling reason to have diskkeeper within 100 miles of the server? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:07 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience > > > > > > > > > As noted before I found my store.exe at 500,000 K this > morning ( An > > > exchange server for 25 people) and the CPU at 100%. > Restarting IS > > > fixed the memory > > > usage but not the CPU usage. So I killed DiskKeeper 7 which > > > I had running > > > in "smart schedule" mode. But it took me a few hours to > > > figure that it was the process using all the CPU. (It took > > > me a bit of time to take a clear look and not run around like > > > a chicken with it's head cut off. And yes I learned a thing > > > or two). So then read a bit and e-mailed exec. Software. They > > > indicate that I should not have to exclude any files from the > > > DK defrag process and that they had no further info on what > > > could have happened. And they also indicate that I should run > > > an offline defrag of exchange using DK once a month or so. > > > Of course I asked for data to support this suggestion as it > > > seems many folks here never use the exchange offline defrag. > > > > > > Jim Liddil > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
