Break your NDA off-list, please, so those of us who honor ours don't have to look at it.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, September 30, 2002 09:26 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: IMC as relay system (off topic) > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > OK. Please tell me what mail software allows to manage queues > on 50 servers in a more centralized manner. > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > Exchange2000 queue management is ok on a single server. > Adequate comes > to mind. > When there are 50 servers in an org it can get frustrating. > > >>Have you seen the queue management in Titanium? > > Yes. On several builds. > > William > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Andrey Fyodorov > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 6:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > What do you not like about Exchange 2000 queue management? > > Hey it is much better than IPSwitch Imail where all the queue > files, temp files, logs, etc a piled up in one Spool > directory. And if someone happens to send 500 messages at > once Imail will choke. > > Rockliffe Mailsite queues are a bit better, at least you have > separate directories for queue message files, queue routing > files, badmail. > > Have you seen the queue management in Titanium? I can't tell > you much more about that because of NDA. > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > Queue management is pretty nice??? > > William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Andrey Fyodorov > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > Exchange 2000 SMTP is quite good, providing you don't skimp > on hardware. I have a couple of Exchange SMTP gateways that > are load-balanced with WLBS. One is a dual CPU, 650MHz, 512 > MB RAM. The other one is single CPU, 800MHz, 512 MB RAM. > > They are probably relaying ~50,000 messages per day and do > not seem to be stressed. > > I like Exchange 2000 as SMTP relay because the queue > management is pretty nice. > > > I would not recommend using IPSwitch Imail as an SMTP gateway > - it chokes when it has to send a lot of mail at once. > > Rockliffe Mailsite is pretty good. It also has aliasing > capability. For example you could create a wildcard alias > *@company.com -> *@exchange.company.com and it will rewrite > the addresses and reroute mail. However I have also seen > MailSite choke on large amounts of mail. And queue management > is not that untuitive. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:40 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > Exchange 5.5 SP4. > > Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information. > > Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the > University finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running > PMDF and is run in a different department. We've been asked > to look at alternative replacement systems. The system is > processing about 40,000 inbound messages a day. I really > like the Exchange IMC since it's menu driven and I have > monitors in place that can page when something happens. Also > it does some validation work, such as SMTP address already > used and so forth. Couple of questions. > > 1) Is anyone else shoving 40,000+ inbound messages through an > IMC? We would have a dedicated box for this function in the > existing site and would only be used for inbound messages > destined for @UC.EDU. It would also route messages to other > e-mail systems such as our student POP/Unix based messaging > system for those users whos alias points to an alternate system. > > 2) Is there some other 3rd party product that is user > friendly (versus text > updates) that might be a good replacement that anyone might > want to recommend? > > 3) We could go with a Linux system with an SMTP mailer. We > do have a administrator on staff here that runs the POP > system and a Linux deployment was mention. I don't like the > fact that its line based and additions are not immediate and > require recompiling (maybe don't have that term right). > > Thanks! > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
