Fine, great you're on a beta. Discuss it somewhere else. Perhaps in the private newsgroups specifically designed for the subject? Jeez.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 10:25 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > Did we say anything specific that would break the NDA? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:01 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > Break your NDA off-list, please, so those of us who honor > ours don't have to look at it. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Posted At: Monday, September 30, 2002 09:26 AM > > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > > Conversation: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > > > > OK. Please tell me what mail software allows to manage queues > > on 50 servers in a more centralized manner. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > > > > Exchange2000 queue management is ok on a single server. > > Adequate comes > > to mind. > > When there are 50 servers in an org it can get frustrating. > > > > >>Have you seen the queue management in Titanium? > > > > Yes. On several builds. > > > > William > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Andrey Fyodorov > > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 6:55 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > > > > What do you not like about Exchange 2000 queue management? > > > > Hey it is much better than IPSwitch Imail where all the queue > > files, temp files, logs, etc a piled up in one Spool > > directory. And if someone happens to send 500 messages at > > once Imail will choke. > > > > Rockliffe Mailsite queues are a bit better, at least you have > > separate directories for queue message files, queue routing > > files, badmail. > > > > Have you seen the queue management in Titanium? I can't tell > > you much more about that because of NDA. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:16 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > > > > Queue management is pretty nice??? > > > > William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Andrey Fyodorov > > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:51 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > > > > Exchange 2000 SMTP is quite good, providing you don't skimp > > on hardware. I have a couple of Exchange SMTP gateways that > > are load-balanced with WLBS. One is a dual CPU, 650MHz, 512 > > MB RAM. The other one is single CPU, 800MHz, 512 MB RAM. > > > > They are probably relaying ~50,000 messages per day and do > > not seem to be stressed. > > > > I like Exchange 2000 as SMTP relay because the queue > > management is pretty nice. > > > > > > I would not recommend using IPSwitch Imail as an SMTP gateway > > - it chokes when it has to send a lot of mail at once. > > > > Rockliffe Mailsite is pretty good. It also has aliasing > > capability. For example you could create a wildcard alias > > *@company.com -> *@exchange.company.com and it will rewrite > > the addresses and reroute mail. However I have also seen > > MailSite choke on large amounts of mail. And queue management > > is not that untuitive. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:40 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: IMC as relay system (off topic) > > > > > > Exchange 5.5 SP4. > > > > Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information. > > > > Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the > > University finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running > > PMDF and is run in a different department. We've been asked > > to look at alternative replacement systems. The system is > > processing about 40,000 inbound messages a day. I really > > like the Exchange IMC since it's menu driven and I have > > monitors in place that can page when something happens. Also > > it does some validation work, such as SMTP address already > > used and so forth. Couple of questions. > > > > 1) Is anyone else shoving 40,000+ inbound messages through an > > IMC? We would have a dedicated box for this function in the > > existing site and would only be used for inbound messages > > destined for @UC.EDU. It would also route messages to other > > e-mail systems such as our student POP/Unix based messaging > > system for those users whos alias points to an alternate system. > > > > 2) Is there some other 3rd party product that is user > > friendly (versus text > > updates) that might be a good replacement that anyone might > > want to recommend? > > > > 3) We could go with a Linux system with an SMTP mailer. We > > do have a administrator on staff here that runs the POP > > system and a Linux deployment was mention. I don't like the > > fact that its line based and additions are not immediate and > > require recompiling (maybe don't have that term right). > > > > Thanks! > > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
