I'm thinking that someone does not check the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox. ;) -----Original Message----- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcoleman@;state.mt.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's
I'm thinking there's a connection between SPAMCop and George Custer :-) -----Original Message----- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Maybe someone had a bad experience in Montana? We're monitoring the blocks pretty closely, and it seems so far that they're not hitting legitimate traffic, yet. ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcoleman@;state.mt.us] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > That was part of the problem...we went to the link on their > site for our IP > address, but no information was available on the specific > message. It just > gave a date that showed when we were first blacklisted. We > spent about 2 > days trying to get additional information from them. They > finally sent us > the header from the message. After tracking down the message > and sender, we > came to the conclusion that it was a legitimate message (not > spam or UCE) > and that the 30 or so recipients were all individuals that > the sender knew. > We sent this information back to SPAMCop, where it apparently > sat in the bit > bucket for 2 more days. They never disagreed with our opinion that the > message wasn't spam, but finally de-listed us. Really > frustrating, all in > all. > > Hunter Coleman > State of Montana > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:08 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Perzactly - and in general they display the specific email > message(s) that > won you the honor of being on their list. > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:22 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > I'm surprised - I've never had any problems with SPAMCop. > > We've had relay problems, which I was able to resolve to > > their satisfaction and get off their list within hours. > > We've also been reported as spammers (we send bulk email out > > to our own customers, with an unsub option - we still get > > reported now and then), and I've been able to get that > > resolved just as quickly. > > > > At the very least, with SPAMCop, they *do* respond. > > Osirusoft and SPEWS do not. > > > > Darcy > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Parrett, Sue [mailto:sparrett@;state.mt.us] > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:39 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > From our experience, Spamcop.net is just as bad as any other > > RBL. They > > blacklisted our domain erroneously for 8 days in August and a > > couple days in > > Sept. Numerous domains were unable to accept mail from us. > > We considered > > their actions a "Denial of Service" and had to threaten them > > with legal > > action to remove our domain name from their list. > > > > Sue Parrett > > E-Mail Support Specialist > > STATE OF MONTANA - DOA/ ITSD > > (406) 444-1392 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:07 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > More likely a combination of b) and a fundamental lack of > > understanding of > > how the RBL they have chosen works with regards to managing > > their black hole > > lists. Purusal of the archives with regards to Mr. Schwartz > > and Dr. Cumming > > about this time last year should provide some valuable > > insight to the issues > > with RBLs in general. > > > > That being said, I'm fairly impressed with the Spamcop.net > RBL - they > > provide documentation of their blocked senders via the web, > > and are very > > quick to retest and remove if the problem has been solved. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:16 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...) > > > > > > Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to > > comprehend > > > its functionality? > > > > > > William > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > > Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an > > > RBL actually > > > is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties > > > to provide > > > the > > > functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in > > > phoning stupid > > > admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company > business. > > > > > > -- > > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > > EMS Sales Engineer > > > MessageOne > > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night > > > > and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking > > > > about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > ======================================================= > > This email and its contents are confidential. If you > > are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose > > or use the information within this email or its > > attachments. If you have received this email in error, > > please delete it immediately. Thank you. > > ======================================================= > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
