Its not the performance issue - it's the fact that you're consolidating
Exchange but not domains. I'm guessing politics is playing into it.

Roger
------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:Alex.Alborzfard@;VISIONICS.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
> 
> 
> Thanks for the response Roger.
> So what are the possible pitfalls of this design; e.g 
> performance, etc.?
> By DNS configured correctly you mean the public DNS MX records, right
> or are you talking about internal one too?
> 
> --Alex
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 7:32 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Interesting EX2K migration solution
> 
> 
> That would work, yes. Its not a good design, but assuming you have DNS
> configured correctly, it should work.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:Alex.Alborzfard@;VISIONICS.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:15 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Interesting EX2K migration solution
> > 
> > 
> > Our company runs EX 5.5 in 2 separate Organizations & NT
> > domains, as well as
> > 2 separate locations.
> > To save in migration cost to EX2K, they've decided to migrate 
> > to EX2K/W2K/AD
> > in only 1 location and move all the mailboxes from other 
> > location there.
> > The other location will retain its NT domain scheme, however 
> > these users
> > will have to log on the remote W2K domain now, to access 
> > EX2K, across a
> > Frame Relay (1024kbps).
> > I thought there has to be a local GC in each location for 
> > this work, but
> > obviously that's not possible in an NT4 domain.
> > 
> > So I'm just wondering, will this work?!
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to