What do you mean? Nothing but barren open spaces in SE Cali.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's That's the law in California. But please don't move here. There are too many people already. Except Redding. You can move there. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Personally, you can smoke in bars all you want...I don't go to bars, so I don't care. Smoking in restaurants however, is something I am vehemently against. Wanna know why? I'm alleric to cigarette smoke. I choke up and can't breath and I won't frequent restaurants that let people smoke inside. Not only that, but smokers NEVER smoke during their own meal, because they have so little sense of taste left, that to do so would interfere with them being able to enjoy their meal. But they have no problem with ruining someone else's meal by blowing smoke all over them while they're trying to eat. Double yuck and good riddance! -----Original Message----- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone@;superioraccess.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Lets talk about something else like making it illegal to smoke in restaurants or bars.... -----Original Message----- From: Andy David [mailto:davida@;vss.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Caution: Thread is hot. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's At no time have I said that companies can't choose to implement RBLs; simply that they should be cognizant of the complete ramifications of the technology. Obtaining this level of understanding is a much better example of risk management than some theoretical defense against a "risk" which appears to have no foundation in reality. Please don't use the McDonalds lawsuit as some type of example of the legal system gone bezerk. If you actually understood the history of the case, you'd find that the judgment itself was well within the bounds of reason, even if the monetary damages awarded appear to be a bit shocking. > -----Original Message----- > From: Finch Brett [mailto:brett.finch@;hrs.ualberta.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Can you say 'risk management'. If someone can drive up to a window, > order a coffee then take the lid off, drive over a speed bump and sue > someone else, anything is possible :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 21:20 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
