An HTML message will take up more space than the same content in plain text message. Also, not every mail client will display the contents correctly (my linux mail client shows the HTML code).
Read this: http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml AW On Thursday 09 January 2003 06:10 pm, you wrote: > Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I > think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But > I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. > > > Plain text. > > On 1/9/03 10:02, "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in > Outlook 98. > > Text/HTML or RTF. > > Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. > > The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
