In addition to the other objections raised, there are plenty of tricks that could be done with stylesheets, embedded content, &c. that would substantially mask or change the content of a message after it had been received by your lawyers. Plain text makes it much harder to insert small print.
-- be - MOS > -----Original Message----- > From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. > > > Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I > think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But > I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. > > > Plain text. > > On 1/9/03 10:02, "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format > to use in > Outlook 98. > > Text/HTML or RTF. > > Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. > > The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
