For $200 an hour, I'd be happy to explain it to the bloosuc^H^H^H^H^H^H^H gentlemen.
On 1/9/03 11:10, "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the way to go because of minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
