Google is your friend... Search phrases like '"SEC Compiant" email' aren't that hard to conjure.
OK, I'll play nice: http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/industries/financial_services/ http://www.optical.com/ You could probably configure http://www.ixos.com or http://www.kvault.com to meet the needs as well. Gary -----Original Message----- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. That was also discussed as a solution but here is why we said no to that one: In one scenario the SEC requested all e-mails from 7 individuals relating to insider trading from a specific period of 7 days. Now if we utilized the Back-up scenario we would have had to do 3 different restores (because the users were spread across 3 different sites and then exmerge the data into 7 different PST's....but what if we have some smart users here and not only did they delete the message but the removed it from the deleted items retention? A backup won't catch that.....Not so far fetched. The Journal is mutch easier to manage from our perspective its just difficult to search. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The SEC is killing me. Just have a 90-day backup tape retention policy. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:05 PM Subject: The SEC is killing me. > Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3 > 100% Active Directory > 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 > > Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to access > every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to > satisfy certain SEC requirements. > > The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an Exchange > 5.5 server. It worked in so far as all the mail went to the > mailbox...but...After it got over 1000000 messages outlook didn't do a very > good job searching it. > > So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it. With > 500000 messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast. So far so > good. > > I guess my questions is....what is everyone else out there doing to satisfy > SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention? Is there a > better way? > Or Better Software? > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
