On 1/22/03 2:34, "Tim Gowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm about to have to justify my personal belief that e-mail should be 
> text-only and no HTML-based messages should go out from my Exchange 5.5 
> server. 

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, at 9:14am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry, can't help you. I don't agree with that belief in the least. 

  I don't like HTML email because 99.999% of it is completely and utterly
useless.  It typically adds nothing to the content of the message at all. In
fact, much of it is actively detrimental: Email attacks, browser attacks,
hidden tracking "bugs", and so on.  Spam and HTML appear to go together as
well.

  Meanwhile, HTML email is often 100% to 1000% bigger than the plain-text
equivalent.  No, that is not a typo.  One-thousand percent.  Ten times.  
That is a mighty big increase in size just to add... well, nothing.

  On one system (we're a consultant), we configured a gateway to
automatically strip HTML content from all incoming mail.  It cut down on
spam and virus attacks markedly, and appeared to reduce storage requirements
(don't have hard numbers, sorry).  The only complaint we received was from a
user who no longer received her email horoscopes in color with graphics.

  Sounds like a win-win situation to me.  :-)

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do  |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.              |



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to