On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, at 2:30pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sounds pretty dull and 1980's to me.
I like dull. Dull means no surprises. :-) > Not one of your reasons poses a problem in environments I work in. I guess they don't apply then. > 1000% bigger for the same content is nonsense. I based that figure on a comparison of the sizes of the text/plain parts vs the text/html parts of several messages in my saved mail collection. The HTML parts were consistently about ten times bigger. Granted, I only checked a handful of messages, so this is hardly a scientific survey, but that's what I saw. I was rather surprised myself. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
