What exactly is your point in all of this? To be honest, I can't follow
any line of reasoning or an actual point to this post. You seem to be
complaining a lot about something, but I am not sure exactly what it is.
There's lots of sarcasm in the post, which seems to be a substitute for
actual substance.

> My DOS application worked under Windows 2000 server, but now doesn't under
> XP. How is that any different than something working under Outlook 97 and
> not under Outlook 2002[1]? Hell, there's functionality that worked in
> Outlook 2000 that was stripped out in Outlook 2000 SR1. Damn that Microsoft!
> Bastards the whole lot of 'em. Stripping out core OS functionality like
> Outlook object hyperlinks. Ye gods, that's more critical than preemptive
> multi-tasking!
> 
> Next thing you know they'll want us all to upgrade to Exchange 2000 and use
> these uniquely addressable hyperlink thingies and webdav. When will they
> learn that 640k is enough RAM for anyone?
> 
> I have no idea what if any syntax will work for your Outlook:// hyperlinks
> Greg, but thanks for the entertainment. I'd test, but I don't exactly use
> Outlook 2002 any longer.
> 
> [1] Counts on fingers.. Outlook 97, Outlook 98, Outlook 98, Outlook 2000,
> Outlook 2001, Outlook 2002... Six. Yep, only six versions. What were they
> thinking?[2]
> [2] There wasn't a similar hyperlink syntax for the Exchange client was
> there? Cause then I'd really be mad at them for changing things TWICE!!!
> 
> On 2/5/03 18:42, "Greg Deckler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> First, I've already seen that Q-article. Still cannot get it to link 
> correctly to an Excel file in Public Folder Favorites. I guess I'll just
> have to keep trying different combinations until I hit the magic syntax
> that makes it work, if it is even possible. 
> 
> Second, it is completely different. Last time I checked, I could still pop
> out to a command prompt and enter "\temp\picture.gif" or "notepad 
> c:\temp\file.txt" and I can look at a file. This is equivalent. 
> 
> Backwards compatibility between an OS that has seen 6 or 7 version changes
> and an OS that has seen 1 version change are completely different things.
> In addition, one is a matter of supporting third-party applications and
> this is a matter of supporting core OS functionality. You cannot blame 
> them for not providing backwards compatibility for applications written to
> an OS eons ago but to not provide compatibility for a core OS function of
> only a year or two ago is sad. 
> 
> > KB 296071 and no it's not that different. 
> > 
> > On 2/5/03 16:36, "Greg Deckler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> > 
> > > That is a far cry from something that worked in Windows 2000 and Outlook
> 
> > > 2000 to Windows XP and Outlook 2002. We're talking basic URL
> functionality 
> > > here. 
> > > 
> > >> Right, I'm still pissed my DOS 3.2 applications don't run on Windows
> XP. 
> > >> Bastards! 
> > >> 
> > >> On 2/5/03 15:57, "Greg Deckler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Well, if you put in the "< >", XP wants to add an "http://"; in front of
> 
> > it. 
> > >> If you do not put that in, it just creates the shortcut, but then it
> > >> throws up an error message saying that Outlook cannot open the folder
> or 
> > >> file. I even tried to "~" as suggested by Slipstick. No luck. Stupid. I
> 
> > >> hate it when Microsoft puts things into their product and then strips
> out 
> > >> functionality or significantly changes things to the point that stuff
> > does 
> > >> not work. Poor, very poor, backwards compatibility. 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________ 
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________ 
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to