Maybe it now uses the same technology as Ontrack and their recovery product
for Exchange mailboxes?

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 February 2003 19:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas BLB


Nothing is impossible Erik, but like you I'm dubious. I'd certainly want to
see this claim proven over a long period of time before I'd let their BLB
solution in the same room as one of my servers let alone installed.
 
And lets face it, if you run with the latest and greatest versions of
exchange and stick to good practice on deleted item / mailbox retention
there ain't that much reason to miss BLBs.
 
Rob

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
        Sent: Mon 10/02/2003 18:56 
        To: Exchange Discussions 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: Veritas BLB
        
        

        I'd be wary of the claim that a BLB solution retains/supports SIS.
Methinks
        they are mutually exclusive. 
        
        Check the FAQ/Archives for the various and correct arguments against
BLB of
        any type. 
        
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:52 PM
        > To: Exchange Discussions
        > Subject: Veritas BLB
        >
        >
        > Internet.com said this got rejected.  So I'll try again.
        >
        > I just got done installing Veritas 9, the upgrade gagged so I
        > spent 3 = hours
        > on the phone with veritas fixing everything.  They are so
        > backed up that =
        > any call more than a few minutes immediately goes to upper
        > level tech =
        > support. The guy mentioned how much better 9 is and mentioned
        > that it can do
        > BLB pretty well now. The support SIS etc. Anyone have any
        > input on this?  I
        > already have read the BLBs are bad stuff.  But I'm interested
        > to see = what
        > people have say.
        >
        > Jim Liddil
        >
        > _________________________________________________________________
        > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
        
        _________________________________________________________________
        List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        

.+--xm,)r(ື\bွ!￶0六&zǚ1r̬:.˛
m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZZvh'+-i٢2ȞG(


**********************************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be 
confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any 
disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this 
communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The 
views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of 
Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. 

This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited.
(05)
**********************************************************************************************


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to