We've offered encrypted e-mail to all of our clients; thus far very few, if
any, have agreed to do it.  They think it's too much of a hassle. <sigh>


-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

And I used to work for the third largest insurance adjusting company in the
country, and information security was NEVER a priority for our customers.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:28 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT
> 
> 
> I work for a Insurance company. One of our biggest priorities is the 
> protection of patient information. Don't generalize a whole industry.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:26 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
> 
> 
> Take exception all you like, for the vast majority of companies 
> involved in health care, patient information is not a priority. Nice 
> that it is in your organization, but yours is the exception rather 
> than the rule I assure you. Think insurance companies care about 
> patient confidentiality? Hell, they don't even care about patients.
> 
> Security second to the pentagon? Perhaps taking a page from their book 
> and setting up public and private networks initially would have solved 
> these types of issues. If protecting patient data had been a priority 
> from the get go, I'd expect this would already be in place. Instead, 
> maintaining that confidentiality was an idea given lip service to 
> while measures were put in place which were known to trade off 
> security for expediency.
> 
> As noble as your organization's intentions are, a thimble full of wine 
> in a barrel of sewer water, still gets you a barrel of sewer water. 
> That's why extremely restrictive regulations were enacted.
> 
> On 2/26/03 7:19, "Chinnery, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Chris, I take exception to your comments in your second paragraph that 
> the reality is that companies don't really care about protecting 
> patient data. I work in a hospital and have met many people from other 
> hospitals through seminars, meetings, etc.  To say that we don't care 
> is patently false.
> Patient confidentiality is a priority, second only to patient care.  
> Our hospital has zero tolerance for PHI disclosure.  A nurse blabs to 
> someone about a patient and boom! she's fired.
>  I know, I've seen it happen.
> 
> The trouble with HIPAA is that they seem to want hospitals and 
> healthcare organizations to be almost as secure as the Pentagon.  Our 
> administration hired a big name outfit to give their recomendations.  
> I had to read through 23 documents from them.  And some of them, the 
> suggestions, were insane.
> One suggested (although it said it was
> optional) searching all purses and bags that patients or visitors to 
> the hospital.  I guess they're afraid someone would sneak in a floppy 
> to be used to copy patient data.
> 
> 
> Paul Chinnery
> Network Administrator
> Mem Med Ctr
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:10 PM 
> To: Exchange Discussions 
> Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT 
> 
> 
> Not an expert on the science behind this essay 
> http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224=easterbrook022403
> <http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224&s=easterbrook022403>
>  , but the idea 
> of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels 
> of hydrogen
> 
> needed for 'clean fuel cells' seems to make the "water is the only 
> byproduct" argument a bit disingenuous. Course as I said, I'm 
> not an expert 
> on the subject so I'm certainly open to knowing where the 
> levels of hydrogen
> 
> needed for such a thing would come from. 
> 
> Perhaps instead of replacing HIPPA, those companies subject to its 
> regulations need to rethink how and why patient data would 
> need to leave
> 
> their environment and design secure systems (which e-mail aint) to 
> facilitate that transmittal. Course the reality is companies 
> aren't really 
> interested in protecting patient data, just in being 
> compliant with the 
> various regulatory agencies which govern them. So, following 
> the cheapest 
> route to compliance they encounter the reality that cheap aint easy. 
> 
> On 2/25/03 16:06, "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> Ok I knew I shouldn't have used that example, cause I knew 
> somewhere we 
> were going to get into a debate about it. In addition I 
> should have said
> 
> Hydrogen Fuel Cells which is what I was thinking of when I made the 
> statement. As far as the pollution: 
> 
> Fuel cells efficiently convert hydrogen fuel and oxygen from the air 
> into electricity. Hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (HFCEVs) emit 
> only water vapor from their exhaust pipes. Demonstrations of 
> HFCEVs have
> 
> been successful and this technology is expected to displace internal 
> combustion engines in the 21st Century. 
> 
> Which I got from pretty much the first thing I could google up here: 
> http://www.hydrogencomponents.com/altfuel.html 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________ 
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to