Ok[1], well no offense, but I'm not going to extend any effort in my lab trying to make what you want to happen work because sub-optimal was polite-speak for stupid. I'll point you to "Recipient Policies" and let you try and create it again if that's really the route you want to take.
Did I mention you can enter subnets for routing as well? That might be a useful tidbit of information, now that 1 machine has become 312 or perhaps not. Beyond that, I still think the method you are currently using and seem bent on continuing to use is sub-optimal. Why not create a Contact in your GAL to represent this object with a secondary SMTP address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] Why not just add the additional data to the existing thread?[2] [2] And not oversnip as was done here? On 3/6/03 10:17, "Jerry J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Recreating the thread I felt I needed to do to make some things more clear > than what I did earlier. To expand of my scenario, the remote PC is > actually 312 remote PC's. So entering their IP addresses is not really an > option. Suboptimal will do for now as we are in the process of writing > software so that we can just send a single e-mail to our alert mailbox, > then it will look at the alert for type and site, grab the e-mails from a > database and send them out from there. But it seems that we need exchange > 2k to write the software. But that part is out of my arena. I am just > trying to get 2k to work as 5.5 does work now. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
