a couple of p2p servers;) ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 08:08 Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
what is the right end of a 256MB pipe? :) -----Original Message----- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 12:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith Technically, I guess they use more, but I'm not 100% sure. Keep in mind that PST's store mail in 2 formats (so 1 message stored twice), but I think that conversion is done on the client side. I have a number of users using Outlook in offline mode on the wrong end of a 256MB pipe that gets shared with lots of other traffic. Outlook, especially the newer versions, are fairly stingy with network traffic. -------------------------------------------------------------- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith > > > Recent conversations have caused me to re-think the entire > Exchange strategy that is in place here. The biggest bulk of > that strategy includes Backups. The new idea is to go with > Item Retention, this highlights the issue that most of the > people round here have Personal Folders containing there > email, which in turn means that there is no way they are > getting backed up. > > The problem im faced with is that a lot of our sites have > only a 64k ISDN link which may be linking 10 people or more! > Okay you can scrutinise me for having such a small link for > such an amount of users, but hey im not going to pay out of > my wages for a larger link ;p > > Anyway, this problem means that working directly from the > Mail Box is out of the question, the next best thing I guess > is Offline-Folders. Offline-Folders appear to be the perfect > the solution, running a small test over a dial up connection > you would think they were the ideal candidate for this > situation. However, a colleague informs me that it > completely kills the network when you have a few people > synchronising folders over an 64k link. > > Do synchronise folders use more bandwidth than your average > Personal Folder? Are there any other issues to consider when > using offline folders as apposed to personal folders? Im > also informed that when you make a new folder in your mail > box it is not automatically synchronised with the server? > > > > Please can you give me all your experience and all your info > on working with synchronise folders within a working > enterprise. No matter how irrelevant you think it may seem, > I would like to know exactly what im in for if I move to this > solution. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
