Try 6MB ATM[1], which is the current standard for our larger office
connectivity.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.

[1] Actually, its 3MB CIR with a 6MB port speed.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:21 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
> 
> 
> Lol, yeah, even if it was a 256KB pipe, that's still 
> 2048kbit, 2mb pipes up and down the country, don't think I 
> could give a toss about offline folders ;)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 09 June 2003 13:09
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
> 
> what is the right end of a 256MB pipe?
> :)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 June 2003 12:47
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
> 
> 
> Technically, I guess they use more, but I'm not 100% sure. 
> Keep in mind that PST's store mail in 2 formats (so 1 message 
> stored twice), but I think that conversion is done on the client side.
> 
> I have a number of users using Outlook in offline mode on the 
> wrong end of a 256MB pipe that gets shared with lots of other 
> traffic. Outlook, especially the newer versions, are fairly 
> stingy with network traffic.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:34 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
> > 
> > 
> > Recent conversations have caused me to re-think the entire
> > Exchange strategy that is in place here.  The biggest bulk of 
> > that strategy includes Backups.  The new idea is to go with 
> > Item Retention, this highlights the issue that most of the 
> > people round here have Personal Folders containing there 
> > email, which in turn means that there is no way they are 
> > getting backed up.
> > 
> > The problem im faced with is that a lot of our sites have
> > only a 64k ISDN link which may be linking 10 people or more!  
> > Okay you can scrutinise me for having such a small link for 
> > such an amount of users, but hey im not going to pay out of 
> > my wages for a larger link ;p
> > 
> > Anyway, this problem means that working directly from the
> > Mail Box is out of the question, the next best thing I guess 
> > is Offline-Folders. Offline-Folders appear to be the perfect 
> > the solution, running a small test over a dial up connection 
> > you would think they were the ideal candidate for this 
> > situation.  However, a colleague informs me that it 
> > completely kills the network when you have a few people 
> > synchronising folders over an 64k link.
> > 
> > Do synchronise folders use more bandwidth than your average
> > Personal Folder?  Are there any other issues to consider when 
> > using offline folders as apposed to personal folders?  Im 
> > also informed that when you make a new folder in your mail 
> > box it is not automatically synchronised with the server?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please can you give me all your experience and all your info
> > on working with synchronise folders within a working 
> > enterprise.  No matter how irrelevant you think it may seem, 
> > I would like to know exactly what im in for if I move to this 
> > solution.
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface:
> > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface: 
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to