Trust me. 256k isn't enough for our users. It all depends on the
application, and the applications one of these offices support uses a lot of
bandwidth between their clients and the servers in our production data
center. Tack onto that Internet access, mail, and other internal
applications, and 256k disappears quickly.



--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:55 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
> 
> 
> how can a 256meg pipe be bad?
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 07:47
> Subject: RE: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
> 
> 
> > Technically, I guess they use more, but I'm not 100% sure. Keep in 
> > mind
> that
> > PST's store mail in 2 formats (so 1 message stored twice), 
> but I think
> that
> > conversion is done on the client side.
> >
> > I have a number of users using Outlook in offline mode on the wrong 
> > end of
> a
> > 256MB pipe that gets shared with lots of other traffic. Outlook,
> especially
> > the newer versions, are fairly stingy with network traffic.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis Inc.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:34 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Sync Folders - Small Bandwith
> > >
> > >
> > > Recent conversations have caused me to re-think the 
> entire Exchange 
> > > strategy that is in place here.  The biggest bulk of that 
> strategy 
> > > includes Backups.  The new idea is to go with Item 
> Retention, this 
> > > highlights the issue that most of the people round here have 
> > > Personal Folders containing there email, which in turn means that 
> > > there is no way they are getting backed up.
> > >
> > > The problem im faced with is that a lot of our sites have 
> only a 64k 
> > > ISDN link which may be linking 10 people or more! Okay you can 
> > > scrutinise me for having such a small link for such an amount of 
> > > users, but hey im not going to pay out of my wages for a 
> larger link 
> > > ;p
> > >
> > > Anyway, this problem means that working directly from the 
> Mail Box 
> > > is out of the question, the next best thing I guess is 
> > > Offline-Folders. Offline-Folders appear to be the perfect the 
> > > solution, running a small test over a dial up connection 
> you would 
> > > think they were the ideal candidate for this situation.  
> However, a 
> > > colleague informs me that it completely kills the network 
> when you 
> > > have a few people synchronising folders over an 64k link.
> > >
> > > Do synchronise folders use more bandwidth than your 
> average Personal 
> > > Folder?  Are there any other issues to consider when 
> using offline 
> > > folders as apposed to personal folders?  Im also informed 
> that when 
> > > you make a new folder in your mail box it is not automatically 
> > > synchronised with the server?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please can you give me all your experience and all your info on 
> > > working with synchronise folders within a working enterprise.  No 
> > > matter how irrelevant you think it may seem, I would like to know 
> > > exactly what im in for if I move to this solution.
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Web Interface: 
> > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> > ext_mode=&lang=english
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to