'cause they will be fighting each other for memory
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and SQL We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram, and 3 raid configurations with about 200 gb of hd space that's basically being used to run a 2 gb database for about 20 users that will never grow. My boss thinks we should move our exchange 5.5 server (about 120 users) to this box (going to Exchange 2000 in a few months) because it's not being utilized fully. Other than the "if we lose SQL we lose Exchange" theory, why else is this a bad idea? Thanks in advance, Scott. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
