According to your definition, everyone I've ever met, including the true "professionals" you've mentioned in earlier posts, has a conflict of interest, except the lowest of the low on the totem pole. Therefore, your definition is so trivial as to be practically meaningless. Thanks for admitting that your point is completely irrelevant! I'm glad that you've finally confirmed what I already know.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 > You still haven't demonstrated that the Conflict of Interest exists. > =20 When you work in an industry and accept gifts from vendors in that industry, that is a conflict of interest. > > Where's the conflict in me (an MS-leaning IT manager) hiring a > MS-knowledgeable person to implement MS-based technology in my > MS-based enterprise? =20 > > The MVP I'm hiring has not swayed me towards the decision to *use* MS > software. I've already made that call. If I decide to rip out all of > = my MS software and deploy chimpanzees with abacuses to run my > business, I will = hire staff/conslutants with comparable experience. > Where's the frigging = conflict of interest? > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
