The flaw here is that that "Cisco Certified" has clearly defined things that must be met and requires a payment to the vendor to achieve. You must PAY to get the required material. You must PAY to take the tests. You must PAY for the certification.
MVP is a gift. There are no explicit requirements and there is no exchange of currency. This is the CLEAR difference between certifications and gifts like MVP. > Titles based on criteria that has been successfully met, as in MVP or > Cisco Certified, etc., has no ethical issues. It is an earned title that > denotes an area of expertise. It is up to those who view the title to > determine if the criteria for getting the title warrants a level of > trust and respect. > > Personal gifts from vendors that you make purchasing decisions regarding > is unethical. > > Rules of ethics are necessary in this business. > > Ceaselessly arguing in order to have the last word is poor use of brain > power, poor use of this list and poor use of ethics. Anyone whose > priority is to *always* win the "fight" must sacrifice the truth and > good judgment, thereby violating basic ethics. > > Just another opinion :-) > > Best Regards,=20 > > Dan Bartley > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:24 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics > > I got to the first paragraph in your post and pretty much quit reading.=20 _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

