about the name, that is... > -----Original Message----- > From: Toni, Randy > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:05 PM > To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' > Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? > > not sure myself anymore... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:02 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server > necessary? > > ::Laughs at Toni or Randy or whichever is his/her first name:: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:58 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? > > > too bad I only have one InoculateIT CD (I can't believe I said > that)... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Miller [Ed] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:55 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server > necessary? > > > > Paul used to have a very nice pyramid of coke cans.. > > > > --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond > > http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:19 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? > > > > > > I need something to put my coke cans on. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:18 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server necessary? > > > > > > so, you want the InoculateIT CD? (heh heh....) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 > > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:10 PM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server > > necessary? > > > > > > Ok! Ok! I got it! I agree! :) > > > > > > -- > > > Matt Lathrum > > > General Dynamics Decision Systems > > > When cryptography is outlawed, > > > bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:50 PM > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > Subject: RE: Is virus protection on the Exchange server > > necessary? > > > > > > I have a copy of InouclateIT Exchange Option you can have if you > > > > really want to give your Microsoft resident some ammo to support > > > > their > > > > > argument ;-) > > > > > > Why would you knowingly let a virus in just because it's "easy" > to > > > clean up? How many PC's/servers/etc will be melting down while > > > you're shutting down Exchange to do the exmerge? How much of > your > > > sensitive data (passwords, > > > whatever) could be floating out to wherever by that time? AV is > not > > > foolproof by itself. Not by a longshot. His comment is > "...when a > > > virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside...". Hmmmm... I > would > > > > > personally want to be a bit more proactive. > > > > > > By the time you discover the virus even exists, it's may not > just > > > the Exchange server that's toast. We had a recent incident with > an > > > exe file > > > (virus) that snuck by the SMTP proxy service (firewall) and got > into > > the > > > Exchange box before the latest AV signatures made it here. It > made > > > it into 41 mailboxes, oh joy.... Fortunately we hammered it > with a > > > trial > > version > > > of > > > a content filtering gateway (a test relay) that used a > policy-based > > > ruleset to strip it as it blew past the broken proxy on it's > towards > > > the not-yet-updated Exchange server (and ultimately a whole > network > > > of potentially-not-yet-updated PC's). We got the AV sig's a > couple > > > hours later, and even at that point it took some time (not much > - > > > but how > > much > > > does a worm need?) for the sigs to roll out to every PC. But > the > > > test relay system rendered it useless. We were lucky. AV > (clients, > > > agents. > > etc.) > > > and > > > the SMTP proxy both failed us. A trial system saved out butts. > > > > Yeah, > > I > > > know, having AV agent on the Exchange box did not help in this > > specific > > > instance, but that's just the point - AV updates (even > automated, on > > the > > > Exchange server, or the desktops, wherever) always have the > > > potential > > to > > > leave little windows of opportunity for a brand-new and > aggressive > > worm to > > > get in. You have to plug every hole. You should be trying to > kill > > > it > > at > > > the gateway, on any relay servers, on the Exchange box, on the > > desktops, > > > at > > > the servers, wherever you can. > > > > > > Defense in depth. Be proactive. Don't knowingly turn your back > on > > > any potential threats. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 > > > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:10 PM > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > > > Subject: Is virus protection on the Exchange server > necessary? > > > > > > > > Our environment has Trend running on the firewall for > anti-virus > > > > and content filtering. We have NAV running on the desktops. > We > > > > are > > > currently > > > > evaluating Antigen and SAVF (Symantec) to put on our E2K > Exchange > > > servers > > > > (including an E2K cluster on a Compaq SAN). However, our > > > > Microsoft resident is suggesting to us that AV on the servers > > > > themselves is not necessary and will only introduce problems > and > > > > instability (particularly Symantec's product). He said that > when > > > > a virus outbreak occurs that actually gets inside, a quick > ExMerge > > > > on the server is just as effective as pushing out virus defs > using > > > > the AV product. > > > > > > > > With AV software on the firewall and on the desktops, what do > > > > people > > > think > > > > about not putting AV on the Exchange servers themselves? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matt Lathrum > > > > General Dynamics Decision Systems > > > > When cryptography is outlawed, > > > > bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. > > > > > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
