Why, that's configured in /etc/rc.conf, if you're doing it in FreeBSD,
silly english knnnnnigget!

Here's the snippet from mine:

ntop_enable="YES"
ntop_flags="-d -u ntop -P /home/ntop/databases -K -L -t 4 -o -i fxp0
-w 192.168.24.239:3000 -W 0 -D mycompany.com -L"

If you're looking for the script that starts ntop, then that's
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/ntop


Heh. Today I caught one of my juniors streaming video from a a web
site, against clear policy.

I have a love/hate relationship with ntop, for that very reason...

Kurt



On Jan 22, 2008 11:06 AM, Don Ely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wasn't in an uproar...  :P
>
> And just for the record, the other day I was talking to myself because I
> couldn't remember where the config file for NTOP was and I said, "self, you
> fscking idiot, stop being so stupid!".
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 10:56 AM, Tom Strader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > HA!!
> > Well, in my 19-20 years in this field, I agree it's been far and few
> between the number of times I have had to use the "so called" exchange
> utilities, however, w hen I came on board, this company was using DEMO
> backup software to backup files, but no Exchange backup so ANDY, you are
> correct, if a good admin has backups that are verified, there is no need for
> such a utility and it is like nails on a chalk board when I get the
> notification that GoExchange is getting ready to perform its' maintenance.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately, not everyone is as knowledgeable as Don Ely, that's why we
> depend on our fellow Admins subscribed to this list, even Don.
> >
> > Don, my skin is quite thick, thank you!!, and yes, unlike you who places
> yourself leagues above everyone else, I do feel stupid sometimes. That's why
> I subscribe to this excellent list and encourage other less fortunate Admins
> to do so to gain a greater knowledge of how to do things "the right way".
> >
> > Your comments are appreciated sir. My apologies for getting your balls in
> an uproar.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
>
> > From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:43 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: GoExchange Response
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To clarify, I did NOT say you were stupid because you used the program...
> >
> > I said "This product was created for stupid people who don't read the
> documentation or listen to PSS..."  So, that wasn't necessarily directed at
> you.  Apparently, it was more appropriately directed at your predecessor and
> you were the unfortunate soul that had to deal with the product...  You just
> happen to take offense to the statement.  In which case, I would say you
> might need to thicken your skin...
> >
> > Their product is designed for a niche market and I would classify that
> market for so-called Exchange admins lacking the brain cells to actually be
> called admins[1].  Would do me no good to tell them I thought poorly of
> their product as it clearly wasn't designed for Exchange admins with a clue.
> Oh, and my hard evidence regarding their product...  I can count on one hand
> how many times I have run ESEUTIL or ISINTEG on an Exchange database in the
> last 11-12 years.  And of those times, I was a consultant called in for
> emergency support to ressurect Exchange...
> >
> > [1] Is that better than the shorter version "stupid"?
> >
> >
> > On Jan 22, 2008 10:31 AM, Tom Strader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Don,
> > >
> > > I can take "constructive" criticism and welcome it if its done in a
> positive light, but classifying anyone as "stupid" just because they use a
> program you disagree with is very unprofessional.
> > >
> > > I DO know Exchange and how to use the utilities (manually), learned the
> hard way. I didn't want to use the program:
> > >
> > > 1.  Because its grossly overpriced
> > > 2.  I feel it is unnecessary if, like you say, you know how to
> administer Exchange.
> > >
> > > However, I was literally "forced" to purchase and install it for this
> company due to their experience with the last "stupid" administrator.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your comments anyhow. I'd suggest if you are so adamantly
> against such a program, you might want to contact them and express your
> feelings to them and provide hard evidence to disapprove the use of the
> program so that we can avoid having other "stupid" administrators in the
> world.
> > >
> > > Have a good day sir!
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
>
> > > From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:14 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Re: GoExchange Response
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't recall what page it was, but when I read "this product was
> designed because most IT people don't know what order to run these
> utilities, etc..."; my opinion was quickly formed...
> > >
> > > That said, if you don't know how to administer Exchange and have no
> intention of learning, this product is for you.  If you DO know how, this
> product is clearly NOT for you...
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 22, 2008 10:10 AM, Tom Strader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Very constructive comment there Don. Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Tom
> > > > "One of the Stupid People"
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
>  From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:03 PM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: Re: GoExchange Response
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Summary of the 9 pages...
> > > >
> > > > "This product was created for stupid people who don't read the
> documentation or listen to PSSS..."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 22, 2008 9:48 AM, Tom Strader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > List,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a response from Lucid8 concerning their GoExchange product
> and the questions that were posted a week or so back. I've tried to post the
> response here but the Lyris server says its too large so if anyone want to
> read their response, please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I'll forward
> it to you.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is in DOCX format.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > >
> > > > > Tom Strader
> > > > > Server Systems Administrator
> > > > > NC Blumenthal Performing Arts Center
> > > > > 704.379.1285 Office | 704.444.2098 Fax
> > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/tstrader
> > > > > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
> problems."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to