The price for the Citrix Netscaler was over $100K. We would have to upgrade our F5 so that is still an option. One of the reasons for the KEMP is that it has integration with UCS.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:09 PM, xyz <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings Todd,**** > > ** ** > > In addition to the Kemp posts , if you are really doing an evaluation, you > may want to look at CITRIX Netscaler, as they have both virtual and > hardware redundant options.**** > > This may be in the $10K range for a pair of LBs, but do your own vendor > investigation, as YMMV.**** > > ** ** > > F5 is another impressive option, but is very expensive – unless you need > all the features.**** > > ** ** > > Regardless, if your production environment is critical, consider having a > redundant LB system and discuss with your selected vendor regarding > recovery options in the event of a LB failure.**** > > ** ** > > HTH.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > ** ** > > Dana**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Todd Lemmiksoo [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 01, 2013 10:44 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > *Subject:* CAS 2010 load balance recommentation**** > > ** ** > > Our two Exchange 2010 CAS servers run in VMware 5.0 UCS environment. I am > looking for load balance suggestions. > **** > > > -- > T. Todd Lemmiksoo **** > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > or send an email to > with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist**** > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > or send an email to > with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist > -- T. Todd Lemmiksoo --- To manage subscriptions click here: or send an email to with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
