+1 On Sunday 07 June 2015, 17:04:12, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to suggest installing systemd units unconditionally. At the > moment, the "systemd" option is mostly used to install them. > > Sometimes, though, e. g. in PHP, it means something completely > different. In other cases, it's used to break cyclic dependencies and > in yet other cases, it's actually used to disable systemd integration. > > It's a mess. > > If we just install systemd units unconditionally... > > - we can use the "systemd" option to just mean "systemd integration" > (and a handful of cyclic dep breakers), > > - we don't hurt anyone - they're tiny text files, > > - we reduce confusion (e. g. PHP usually should have the systemd > option *disabled*), > > - we get rid of an option that's purely for runtime configuration, > > - we reduce the options clutter, > > > Plus: The systemd option defaults to on anyway so unless someone > globally sets "-systemd" (fool!) the units are installed anyway. > > > Please do respond even if it's just +1. Knowing you lazy bastards ;-), > though, I'll just do this - unless there's violent opposition - in > about a week from now. > > > -- > Best regards, Wulf > > _______________________________________________ > Exherbo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
